Re: Refine Filters module released
Quote:
Thanks for noticing it. Actually, this is a tricky issue. Let me try to explain. Imagine there are two classes with two options each, combined in four variants. For example, Color: Red, Green Size: S, L the resulting variants are: Red S Red L Green S Green L Now, let's say "Red S" variant is out of stock. How in this case should the filtering behave? In fact, there is no problem if the filters selection is as follows: Color: Red Size: S In this case we can disable "In stock only" filter but what if it's chosen like: Color: [not selected] Size: S or Color: Red, Green Size: S Should it disable "In stock only" filter in these particular cases? It's a hard question, isn't it? This is a very basic variants example. Imagine, there are 10 classes with 10 options each. A customer will have to choose one and only one attribute from each variants-related filter to have "In stock only" react basing on variants stock levels. Nevertheless, I've registered this in our bugtracker - we will think what can be done here. Your suggestions will be much appreciated. Thank you. |
Re: Refine Filters module released
Quote:
I've registered this bug. We hadn't have a chance to check the compatibility with all paid add-ons before the release. |
Re: Refine Filters module released
Quote:
This is something strange. It works fine at our installations. I suggest you to post a support ticket to helpdesk. Please make sure we have an up-to-date access to your server. |
Re: Refine Filters module released
Quote:
Quote:
If a customer wants Red and Green in size S (quite common I think), the filter should behave alike: if "in stock only" is checked, shows Green S (Red S is out of stock), otherwise shows both items. Quote:
But what is actually funny is that every filter I have had a look at, had "filter by size" option, obviously designed for apparel stores. And they were all based on option classes, disregarding availability. But we all know that when a clothing store owner buys a jacket, he buys sizes S,M,L,XL,XXL etc., at least in most cases. And soon he ends up with only L in stock, the thing cannot be reordered because it is last fall collection and so on. In a case like this filtering by size is useless since most items have all the sizes. If a customer searches for size L, he definitely should have an option "show only what is in stock". Otherwise this filter is good only for people who search for a quadruple L or XXS - sizes that are not so common. And adding "in stock only" filter is only confusing because apparently it does not filer by availability. By the way: what is this filter for? To show in-stock items when "show out of stock items" is checked in apperance settings? But thanks for your answer. I know you guys will come up with a good solution soon. |
Re: Refine Filters module released
Did you check your public demo? In my case it has the same issue.
Quote:
|
Re: Refine Filters module released
Hello Thanks for the great module.
I love how it can pick up your variants however I have found a issue I can not solve. Example I sell some motorcycle helmets and we have the following sizes S XS M L XL XXL When the variants display on the filter page it displays them in ABC order I need them to display from S to XXl How do you set the positions to display on items you need NOT by ABC Thanks |
Re: Refine Filters module released
I'm guessing this module won't be available for 4.4.X ?
|
Re: Refine Filters module released
Quote:
Sure, we will do our best to find the best solution. Thank you. |
Re: Refine Filters module released
Quote:
It's even more strange now :) We will take a look what the problem is. |
Re: Refine Filters module released
Quote:
For now, it's not possible to sort attributes and we now realize that it is a problem. ADDISON already pointed this issue out so we planned to implement the sorting ability. It will be included into the module soon. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.