Re: AMP HTML and XC5
My opinion as well... https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/19/open_source_insider_google_amp_bad_bad_bad/
|
Re: AMP HTML and XC5
Quote:
In all related threads, we've made it clear that following Google's Self-Made rules like lemmings is NOT for us. However, the active thought process behind Mobile First Design is present now, not just in AMP, so that should hopefully be a big factor for any future XC5 upgrades because to be fair, this criteria isn't top of the pile - yet. That same thought process applies (ironically) when viewing the results of any current release XC5 Google page speed tests and can also relate back to both the fonts and other related threads too. At some point Mobile First Design will supersede Desktop First Design in terms of XC5 'design pecking order' and when it does, it could easily be totally AMP exclusive :mrgreen: |
Re: AMP HTML and XC5
If you want Google to own your content, go ahead...
|
Re: AMP HTML and XC5
Quote:
Quote:
i.e. totally excluding AMP aka a XC5 Mobile First Design format but one which is completely free of AMP and all it's "self-made rules" :wink: |
Re: AMP HTML and XC5
I never miss your sarcasm, Triple A :-) I get it. Some others won't.
But AMP should die. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.